SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards

INSP 90.66

+5.3%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neenny who wrote (529)	4/15/2001 2:00:35 AM
From: Neenny	of 1100

Edit to this post... These are my words..."Take note, she never said that is what she thinks or believes but merely offered it up as a possible explanation for your inferring that Ihub was not registered as a cooperation.....you also questioned if they are paying the state as they should be.." I thought by using the italics as is often done on this site, it would separate my words from the quote in Joseph's post. These again italicized words are his, They must be somewhere, if they are paying salaries don't they have to pay the state something somewhere along the line? He must not have remembered how often the italics are used to differentiate between who said what on this site. As he had not posted much for a while before this ......hope this clears it up!!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next