Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 48.72

+3.0%

Jan 14 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: fingolfen who wrote (132566)	4/17/2001 12:52:45 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (2) of 186894

Re: The Pentium ran 16-bit code slower than the 486 did too But at the time of its release, 32 bit code had already been mainstream in windows, office, and all compilers for more than a year - it was only a few older apps that suffered. Pentium Pro was a srcreamer on mainstream, current applications - twice as fast as a pentium. P4 is pathetic on old code, poor on current mainstream code, and almost as fast as the processor it is replacing on much future code. P4 is a true disaster. Confirmation of that will appear after the bell, today. How much earnings growth do you expect in this, the first quarter of P4's ramp? How much earnings growth will be forecasted for next quarter, as the P4 get to even higher volume? Dan

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next