Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: BigShoulders who wrote (13834)	4/18/2001 10:09:12 PM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (3) of 42834

For someone who bought at 83 (or higher as some have said) I think they should take responsibility for the losses down to 75 1/8. Brinker can be blamed for the rest, and that's a lot. The people that called his office and got "comfortable with $86" will not be pleased with your ruling. Rememer CT#1 when he said to "wait for mid $70's to buy" and it never came back but we heard of many that bought ANYWAY at about $82 and then he helped them with his stop at $84 to make sure they went out on top? I think since so many including Brinker used the $82 price in the First CT rally... then $83 is fair in the 2nd. but that is just my opinion. Heck, he called for a CT rally of "up to 50% or more" in Jan 2001 and it only went 25% before going down to $34... I think people are so tired of it now that they don't even calculate that failed CT rally...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next