SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 235.24+4.5%Nov 19 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (45613)4/19/2001 7:10:14 PM
From: Kirk ©  Read Replies (2) of 70976
 
The fundamentals are worse now then in January, but the "expectation" spin put on it is better. LRCX is a good example. Orders have fallen more steeply than Bagley can remember. This must be the worst it can get, he concludes, and the market takes it as a positive.

No. He says orders are UP and he expects to have higher (not a lot but higher none the less) orders the next 2 quarters BUT he is shell shocked from how badly he missed the shutoff that gave the current quarter. Fundamentally, the slope has changed and the orders are currently on a positive slope... unless he gets some cancellations.

As to a "rational price" for LRCX... I wish I had a clue but I plan to lighten up if we get a major run to some really high numbers... but not sure yet what they will be. I added in the low $20's too early on the way down just like I sold a few too early going up but those low $20 shares now look pretty good at $31.40. My core shares (80% of them)... those are LTBH with a tiny basis... 8)

I think it might be time to read one of Tito's step building posts.

Maybe I just hate to pay taxes...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext