Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (96303)	4/19/2001 8:37:42 PM
From: Mark Adams	Read Replies (3) of 436258

debt service at nearly 15% of disposable income, both record highs Can you provide a source/reference for this? Per my prior efforts, I put the Total Interest Burden, as a percentage of disposable personal income, close to 3%. I realize the debt to disposable income ratio would be higher, yet believe this "interest coverage ratio" is the key to understanding the consumer debt. Message 15543838 While we are at it, I'm ready to thrust a shaft of malcontent into the comparisons by Richard Russell, in last weeks Barrons. While I respect the man, I don't believe you should compare the PEs on stocks during the 73/74 bear with today, as inflation and interest rates are totally different. The macro environment today is not the same as then, and I would go so far as to say that PE ratios should be lower if interest rates were pushing 10% today. If anything, the comparisons done in that article point out the potential folly of comparing the past and present using such a narrow indicator in a vacuum.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next