Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 166.58

-0.1%

2:47 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: qveauriche who wrote (97925)	4/23/2001 9:26:05 PM
From: Rajala	Read Replies (1) of 152472

>Rajala, if you don't understand how QCOM could have >absolutely secure IPR rights in WCDMA and still prefer a >CDMA 2000 world you are the village idiot. Go home. You >don't matter. You have nothing useful to contribute. Oh dear, qveauriche. Sometimes you sound so awfully irritated. Hypertension? Or worse, bad calls? Furthermore, you seem to suffer of a little misconception about the technology. Marketing BS aside, CDMA2000 1X can not and is not competing with WCDMA. Its like GPRS: a cost effective addition to existing 2G system of a certain technology, increasing the data speeds to a max of around 100 kbs on the field. Biggest difference is that CDMA2000 has a manual gearbox. WCDMA is a different matter. Koreans call CDMA2000 as 2.5G - Dr. J admitted that himself. And them guys are no spring chicken when it comes to CDMA systems (and between us: they know a betamax system when they see one). If ITU labels CDMA2000 as 3G, that does not a fast system make. If you know what I mean. And you can´t tell me to go home, it´s not polite. Besides I´m already there. - rajala

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next