Puck, I'm sorry you submitted Post #2867. Freedom of speech and expression on the internet is too sacred to stop you from posting the irrational outpouring of libelous, scandalous invective which appears in your message. Any neutral observer would view your ranting non sequiturs and unsupported insulting remarks as indisputable proof that you fit the description of your characterization of Roger. You are anonymous on the thread. Roger is well known, personally, to many on the INSP and other threads. His excellent reputation is secure. There is nothing in his post, or mine, to suggest that he disputes your conversation with Nicole. Quite the contrary, as I specifically stated in my last post on the other thread. In fact, I doubt whether he yet knows about your conversation with Nicole. It was never mentioned by you, on either thread, until today, although it may have taken place near the time he posted the evidence of his conversation with Nicole. As a matter of fact, the earlier of your posts today did not contain any reference to the name of the IR woman who spoke to you. You owe Roger a sincere apology. Your reputation for integrity and decency is at stake.
Sy |
