Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)

AMZN 233.95

+0.3%

Dec 1 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (124071)	4/24/2001 8:06:56 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Read Replies (1) of 164684

This is from The Street.com. The number is accurate but is not deducting for the pay down in accounts payalble. If we want to discuss this here, I believe we should define what we call cash burn. The reason being Alomex added the payable back in as did I with my original calculation. From a technical view point, we are combining a little of working capital with cash burn. No one was inaccurate here but we had differing definitions of cash burn. My suggestion is we analyze them two ways. One being their working capital and one being their "actual" cash burn. What is the definition of "is"? LOL

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next