International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Turboe who wrote (11835)	6/11/1997 12:23:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	of 35569

David: You missed my point. I personally don't care whether Findley's rantings scare off potential investors or not. My point is he acts like he is morally superior for questioning the hype artists on this thread; when it may turn out his position is wrong. He thinks of himself as the savior of all of the unsophisticated dupes who would buy the hypesters words, hook, line and sinker. He does not know his position is correct. Therefore, as far as I am concerned, Findley is exactly the same, or worse than the hypesters. You give David credit because he called one or two people. Big deal. Last night he tried to put this stock in the same boat as Bre-X, because Bre-X had consultants working for it, too. If this is an example of Findley's DD, then he should stick to savings accounts, because anyone familiar with the Bre-X situation knows that Kilborne did not provide a chain-of-custody audit of Bre-X samples. They merely estimated reserves based on data provided to them by Bre-X. I agree with you that following Claude's advice is a good strategy at this point for investors. I will not presume to try and give advice to traders.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next