Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Philosopher who wrote (12333)	4/27/2001 1:34:58 AM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (3) of 82486

owed to uphold the teachings and practices of the church. It would have been a violation of her most sacred vows--a most serious sin--for her to have approved of birth control. But this is why I have said repeatedly that you have to view decisions in their context. Basically, expecting her to support birth control was expecting her to be disobedient to her most sacred vows. If an organization you belong requires you to practice evil, is it not your responsibility to disassociate yourself from it and then oppose it? Otherwise, "I was only following orders" is a valid defense. "Context" simply does not cut it here. Germany had been screwed by Britain and France after WWI. Does that justify Hitler?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next