From January: <WAG cumulative mobile numbers:
x = 10,000 mobile handsets.
- = 5,000
Mar-
Junx
Sepxx
Decxxx-
Marxxxxx
Junxxxxxxxxx
Sepxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Decxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That's 170,000 by December 2001. I increased it from 140,000 because they seem to be trimming prices a bit and gateways continue to roll out and roaming improves.>
Oh dear, things are not looking good. Subscribers to December were only 31,000. So I guess we need a graph like this...
x = 10,000 mobile handsets.
- = 5,000
00Mar-
00Junx
00Sepxx
00Decxxx
01Marxxxx
01Junxxxxx
01Sepxxxxxxxx
01Decxxxxxxxxxxxx
02Marxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That's only 120,000 by December. Down from my [obviously wishful thinking] 170,000 which is not surprising since there has been negligible improvement to marketing and some appearance of decline in marketing efforts. Price plans haven't been touched [to speak of]. Blackstone remains disappeared in a black hole. Time dilatation seems to be a part of Globalstar [due to cosmic effects of reverse spinning Gravitons I suppose - now recently discovered they claim and called 'dark matter'].
Anyone who touches Globalstar disappears into the void.
The 120,000 assumes that there is a restructuring with GG's metaphysical certitude of antithapy to cheap minute prices by industrial-age telecom companies being swept away in a restructuring and new, improved, marketing 'plan'.
Mqurice
PS: Notice that despite all the hoohah, GlobalstarLP still does not see fit to publish a graph of MOU on the website! Simply amazing. What more basic piece of information should they be making available to shareholders [and everyone]? There is an insider-trading opportunity provided by keeping that information secret [which is unwise]. I still see no benefit in maintaining secrecy on MOU sales. McDonalds was happy to put their Big Mac sales out the front on their signs. C'mon Big Mac, how about giving us the data? |
