A.S.
"I think you understand me better now" Happy? Does little for me.
The whole and only point from the beginning is that your
repetitive and one-sided nature of posting is redundant, annoying, not particularly informative, and comes off as hyping and spamming. What do I mean? Look at your reply to me. Lean back, get an over-all kind of view, what do you see?
I get the impression someone is trying to sell me on buying SCNT and tech stocks. Not just sell, hard sell. Won't take no for an answer kind of hard-sell. When your view is questioned you become very defensive.
Look, you're probably a nice person. You're probably not a hard person to get along with. You conduct yourself civilly unless pushed too far.I assume you are only trying to help others make money like you do. But, I don't know you. You are a faceless, aliased, cyber-personality frequenting a tiny cyber-space on a relatively new and morphing phenomenon they call the internet. I can only "know" you from what you post and how you post it. If you come across pushy, unyielding, dogmatic and extremely broken-record-like.....how do YOU think most people will perceive you? Why do YOU think you have so many attackers as you say?
BTW...here is the research you requested:
siliconinvestor.com
I see under the section I previously mentioned a trend of rising debt. What do you eyes see?
Also, please explain this:
insiderscores.com
I realize that the information is not current. But what I see I don't like...at all. Do you have more current info? Are insiders buying? Frankly, I'd be embarrassed to recommend something like that.
I'd also like to know if you ever tell people to sell a stock when you sell? Do you relentlessly tell people to dump when the time has come? That would be only right, considering the effort you expend convincing others to buy what you buy.
One well written analysis of your recommendation considering pros and cons should be enough. Post after post is too much.
Quality, not quantity.
That's all I'm saying.
Eichler |
