SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 234.10+1.7%10:39 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: kash johal who wrote (37778)4/29/2001 12:52:44 PM
From: fyodor_Read Replies (1) of 275872
 
Kash: I think that you and the thread are under a severe misconception on PIV costs.

The die cost difference is only $20-30.

So intel will make tons of money on $200-250 PIV's compared to $150 PIII's.


The issue is not so straight-forward.

Intel can make 1 P4 instead of 2 PIIIs: (using your numbers, roughly)

Profit on 1 P4 ~ $250 - $50 = $200
Profit on 2 PIIIs ~ $300 - $60 = $240

Yeah, these numbers are not that good, but it does get the message across.

Intel's key will be to try and maintian PIII vs perhaps reduce celeron.

Exactly. However, you can strike the "perhaps". Intel won't be increasing total wafers out this Q, so every P4 produced "steals" capacity from PIII or Celeron.

If Intel can keep PIII unit shipments steady (while increasing P4), they are going to make a bundle of money. However, if PIII shipments fall by 2x the rise in P4 shipments (which I consider more likely), it's going to hurt.

-fyo
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext