Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 35.53

-1.1%

Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pgerassi who wrote (133748)	4/30/2001 7:25:48 PM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Hi Pete, RE: price collusion Your accusations of dumping, fly in the face of Sander's potential price-fixing attempts. It would be illegal for Sanders to phone an Intel exec and ask Intel to not lower prices. I believe that is called price-fixing. However, it could be perfectly legal for Sander's to signal a price-fix to Intel, through a public analyst conference call, by emphatically stating that he will not enter a price war with Intel. Who would even suspect a name-calling executive as a price-fixer? (if that's what he was up to) Fortunately, for the consumer, Intel ignored (what may have been) Sander's smoke signal. Btw, regarding some of the accounting differences you mentioned. I agree with you that it would be better for shareholders of any company, if companies were more consistent in their method of accounting reports so that cross-company comparisons can be made more easily. It's difficult when they are not. Regards, Amy J

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next