SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 94.26-11.1%Dec 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tony Viola who wrote (71498)5/2/2001 4:25:20 AM
From: John Walliker  Read Replies (3) of 93625
 
Tony,

So now Rambus is claiming they invented multiplexing? That was in use before even Intel was. Obviously I'm missing something, shouldn't do drive-by posts.

You are missing something. Rambus never claimed to have invented multiplexing. The problem is that their claims were made in relation to a preferred implementation which used a multiplexed bus. The judge has ruled that their claims are ONLY valid in conjunction with a multiplexed bus.

SDRAM multiplexes some of the address lines at initialisation to configure the output delay register. Therefore SDRAM uses a multiplexed bus.

However, Carl (Bilow) has argued that the individual parts of the bus should be treated separately, so he claims SDRAM is not multiplexed because the data lines only carry data. He does not disagree that the address bus in SDRAM carries configuration data.

I argue that because a data bus is useless without address and control lines the bus must be treated as a whole, in which case SDRAM is definitely multiplexed. (This discussion happened a few weeks ago.)

John
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext