Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 341.09

+2.6%

9:33 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Trader who wrote (46080)	5/2/2001 10:14:03 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) of 70976

"Michael, I believe the boomer argument makes sense. I am a boomer also, but you have 16 years on me, and certainly more experience with investing as well". I am 56 and born in 1945. My mom got to visit my dad I guess, so i was born in august 1945 about the time of the A-bomb drop. If you are 40, you were born in 60-61. Is that still classified as boomer timeframe? If so, we have quite a long time for demographic effect to remain positive. At some point folks my age will be cashing out offsetting your end of the spectrum. It looks like a good 10 years before we really have to worry.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next