SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: slacker711 who wrote (11186)5/2/2001 1:05:49 PM
From: MikeM54321  Read Replies (2) of 12823
 
"They would still get the same royalties off of W-CDMA but would likely have a lower chipset marketshare (though of a larger total market)."

slacker- Whoops. I'll go try to find our posts where we talked about this aspect....Well apparently I did not read your details carefully enough. Here is what you wrote:
Message 15493816 ...from this post I infered that Qualcomm was only going to get a "handset royalty" and not a chipset royalty from the sale of W-CDMA phones.

And here is why I thought what I did (no W-CDMA chipset royalty for Qualcomm):
Message 15498156

You say, "W-CDMA was a standard created by companies who were looking to avoid the type of lock that Qualcomm enjoys in 2G CDMA (or MSFT/INTC in computers). Nokia, Ericsson and Sony have all signed with TI for W-CDMA chipsets..."

I took it to mean that Nokia, Ericsson and Sony do not have to pay a royalty to Qualcomm for the chipset. But apparently you are saying although this group developed W-CDMA standard, it is STILL based on Qualcomm's patented CDMA technology so they still need to pay Qualcomm royalties for each chipset produced. Is this accurate? Thanks. -MikeM(From Florida)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext