SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation
CRSP 52.18-2.5%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: nigel bates who wrote (3676)5/4/2001 11:16:04 AM
From: keokalani'nui  Read Replies (1) of 52153
 
Shhhh, TSC has a tip. Actually, this is sort of interesting:

Three More Patent Plays
By John Rubino
Special to TheStreet.com
5/4/01 8:29 AM ET


To everyone who responded to last week's column by sending in your favorite patent litigation plays, many thanks. Normally, I don't do consecutive columns on the same subject, but some of these stories are too good not to broadcast. The following, for instance:

Napro Biotherapeutics (NPRO:Nasdaq - news) holds what looks like a rock-solid patent covering the formulation of a drug called paclitaxel, which, under the brand name Taxol, is Bristol-Myers' (BMY:NYSE - news) -- and the world's -- biggest selling cancer drug.

Paclitaxel was discovered by the National Institutes of Health, so the compound itself isn't able to be patented. Bristol-Myers, however, has gotten around this by patenting things like use and dosage, which so far has given it a near-monopoly.

What follows comes from a money manager who's long the stock, and wants to remain anonymous: Later this year, in partnership with Abbott Labs (ABT:NYSE - news), Napro will bring out its own generic version of paclitaxel, which my source thinks will grab 30% of the market, netting Napro $2 to $3 a share. At the current price of $7, this alone makes it a buy.

But the real upside comes from a suit that Napro has filed against Bristol-Myers, alleging patent violation on recent sales of Taxol. The case will be tried some time in 2002, and more than likely appealed into 2003, so it's a long way from yielding any actual cash. But "Napro's position is quite strong," says my source. And the numbers it's seeking -- treble damages on revenue of over $1 billion a year -- make this case a potential blockbuster for a company with a market cap of only $200 million.

Wilder
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext