Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)

AMZN 232.50

+0.1%

Dec 26 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: H James Morris who wrote (124643)	5/5/2001 2:05:01 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Read Replies (1) of 164684

Glenn, my point was is Amzn including details they never did before? I don't know so that's why I'm asking. No they are not. One could reconcile the pro forma numbers in the past. The problem is actual expense for specific operations are still not broken down. Therefore, it is impossible to know how much of the fulfimment they are attributing to BVM ar anything else for that matter. The current pro forma information just tells you how much they really lost according to GAAP and from where it came meaning amortization, interest, etc. All that information use to be in their 10Ks and 10Qs but one had to dig it out is all. They used footnotes in the past. During the last year, it seems more analysts and journalists were reading the footnotes and then doing stories about the real picture. I suspect management at Amazon decided just to throw the footnote info in their release rather than later have negative journalistic comments.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next