SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JKNF who wrote (11927)6/11/1997 9:27:00 PM
From: David G. Findley   of 35569
 
In keeping with the best traditions of openess and honesty, I am posting here the following emails I received late today, and my replies:

Subj: Warning
Date: Wed, Jun 11, 1997 3:03 PM EDT
From: jill@techstocks.com
X-From: jill@techstocks.com (Jill)
Reply-to: jill@techstocks.com
To: findleydg@aol.com

Please express your negative views more
effectively. Avoid personal attacks and
flame wars on our site, please.

Regards,
Jill

=====================================
This was followed by this post from Bob Jagow:

Subj: Bye
Date: Wed, Jun 11, 1997 4:48 PM EDT
From: jagowb@jps.net
X-From: jagowb@jps.net (Bob Jagow)
To: findleydg@aol.com

Hope your silver tongue can convince Jill that you're not a boil to be lanced.
See if Kee's still around.

Good Luck

=======================================================
SI's Jill posted to me at 3pm, Mr. Jagow at 4:48pm. I originally responded to Jill as follows:

------
Date: Wed, Jun 11, 1997 8:56 PM EDT
From: FindleyDG
Subj: Re: Warning
To: jill@techstocks.com

Jill,
I have tried to avoid flame wars, but I have defended myself when attacked, particularly by a group of individuals I believe to working in concert to scam the IPMCF board.

I will in the future quitely suffer the abusive and scatological insults hurled at me.

all the best,
David G. Findley

============================================================
Upon realizing the close temporal coupling between SI Jill's post and Mr. Jagow, I wrote to Jill again as follows:

---
Date: Wed, Jun 11, 1997 9:00 PM EDT
From: FindleyDG
Subj: Explanation requested
To: jill@techstocks.com

Jill,
I received the attached message from Mr. Jagow today. Can you explain the seeming synchronization between your warning to me and his knowledge of same? Is there a conflict of interest here? Was Mr. Jagow warned for his posts as well? Do I need to refer this matter to a higher level of SI management?

thank you,
David G. Findley


===============================================================
In conclusion, I feel we are all owed an explanation of the synchronization between SI's Jill and Mr. Jagow.

I had believed that SI operated a fair and open forum; I am willing to abide by their admonitions, even when I feel they are unjustified. However, in light of this coupling of messages, I now wonder just what is going on behind the scenes here.

SI may well retaliate for this post and clobberize my login - if so - I hope there are some of you out there who have taken some aid from my words.

all the best,
David G. Findley
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext