SONS Message Board - Msg: 15765533

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SONS

SONS 7.830

+2.8%

Nov 28 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Theophile who wrote (73)	5/7/2001 12:05:06 PM
From: danofthebes	of 1575

Guaranteed delivery Although this is a topic more suited to the CSCO/JNPR boards, I agree with your comments regarding Diffserv,RSVP, etc... Regarding the 'guaranteed delivery' issue, Cisco has been hammering home the 'packet misordering' problem ever since JNPR's 160 was declared victorious in the LightReading/Network test router competition. Here's a link. lightreading.com the whole test... lightreading.com Look for more FUD from both sides when the JNPR 320 hits the streets. As far as SONS/GX relationship affecting the CSCO choice, from a GX technology perspective the softswitch implementors are probably just noise to the core network engineering group. I would guess that interoperability discussions are held, but that the core guys get what they want and everyone else has to hook up accordingly. If I'm Juniper and I know I've lost core business to CSCO, I may go to a GX partner and try get an annoucement out that would provide some counterpoint to the GX/CSCO press, but given the lack of any real content in the SONS/JNPR announcement, I consider it a non-event. No reason for SONS to say no as there was certainly no exclusivity involved. If they announce a joint customer win, now that's another story.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next