SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dr.MensaWannabe who wrote (1434)	5/8/2001 9:27:49 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) of 5315

Actually, her last post is "attributing" the accusations to another source sent to her. But each time she wades into the pond, she sinks a little deeper. Unless of course there is veracity to her statements. All that needs to be yet born out. Third defence against libel: The third defense is claiming, and proving, that the statement was an opinion, not an assertion of a fact. Since this last defense is only as good as the weakest or worst, but still reasonable, misinterpretation, it's not one you really want to rely on. There's a world of difference between saying "I think he's a crook," and "he's a crook". Especially if a third party might inadvertently leave out the first two words when passing your message on.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next