Computer Learning Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Computer Learning

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SIer formerly known as Joe B. who wrote (19588)	5/8/2001 9:37:51 PM
From: PMS Witch	Read Replies (1) of 110652

I like grouping similar stuff on their own partitions. My disk is divided into three: One for the OS, another for my own stuff, and the third for images. Drive Image compresses my OS until it occupies half the space allowing two copies of my OS partition if it was full and many more otherwise. Your plan looks workable. Partition Magic enables you to alter your disk without losing data. Since you plan on saving your data to another drive, you can use FDISK supplied with Windows. The downside being a bit of extra work, and needing to repeat the process for any later alterations. Storing images on the 'other' drive seems like a wise choice. You'll get a little extra protection against hardware failure at no extra cost or effort. I think using NTFS with W2K is wise, but since I know nothing of N2K or NTFS, I doubt you could derive much comfort from my approval. FAT 32 has limits, but I don't know what they are. Cheers, PW. P.S. I did some 'discount bin diving' at the local computer store and surfaced with a copy of Partition Magic for about $15 with a $10 mail-in rebate coupon inside. (I also found a Drive Image, but since I already had a copy (full price), I left it for the next person.)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next