Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 320.14

-0.7%

1:18 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (46453)	5/9/2001 1:47:47 AM
From: Ian@SI	Read Replies (1) of 70976

Cary, Thanks for taking the time to respond. I think I now understand the crux of our differing views. It's in your last paragraph. I don't believe that it is OK to sacrifice the long term viability of the US because it is best for the whole world. If my grandparents had not come here, I would probably have not been born or I would have died at a very young age. I believe that all parties to Free and Fair trade benefit; not all parties except the USA. All countries' long term viability is enhanced. Not only will the wealthy nations become wealthier, but the less developed nations will also improve their lot in life, be it education, healthcare, nutrition, shelter or enjoyment of leisure. And yes, that will permit more children to be born and to live to a ripe old age. I truly see this as a win-win situation. And yes, one of the choices for using the increased wealth could be to support those that are less able to provide for themselves whether they live in the US or elsewhere. My choice would be to help those displaced get a new start rather than welfare or some similar social net. But that's just a personal view I hold rather than an economic assessment. Ian.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next