SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 332.72+4.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cary Salsberg who wrote (46578)5/10/2001 11:58:54 PM
From: Sam Citron  Read Replies (2) of 70976
 
You are correct that I am enamoured of the competitive market as the best means of allocating scarce resources. But believe me, this respect does not derive from any ivory tower perspective of how markets are expected to perform. Ken Galbraith was still teaching economics when I entered Harvard in 1976 and such pure views were not in vogue. Rather, my respect for markets derives from the simple fact that markets will always be the final arbiters of supply and demand in a free society.

I would not pretend that markets are always subject to pure competition and that is where I believe government has a legitimate role to play, to level the playing field, prevent abuse of market power, etc.

As I implied in my previous posts, I have little sympathy that one of the wealthiest segments of American society (software programmers and engineers) should begin to feel some competition from the third world. The inefficiency of the American software industry is almost legendary (cf. John Brooks, The Mythical Man Month, etc.) What makes them worthy of protective status? Jean Valjean a programmer -- give me a break!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext