Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin

RMBS 104.71

+0.6%

Dec 9 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SBHX who wrote (72619)	5/11/2001 7:54:11 PM
From: jim kelley	Read Replies (1) of 93625

Actually, Rambus was only found guilty of Count 10. Hager is wrong. You can not be both guilty of constructive fraud and actual fraud. Actual fraud is sufficient. There is no evidence that Rambus negotiated in bad faith with any of their clients. That was not an issue in this case. This fraud verdict is on the surface very weak. The jury seems to have found that Infineon "relied" on Rambus silence. I think the jury bought Desmairis (the balding 50 something lawyer) characterization of Rambus attempts to protect its IP from expropriation as illegal when it is not. But IMO no evidence was produced that proved that Infineon was "relying" on Rambus silence. The plotted to cath Rambus is that type of fish net IMO.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next