SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 252.09-0.3%Jan 29 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: fyodor_ who wrote (39236)5/12/2001 2:33:40 PM
From: John EvansRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
I have placed P6 series processors (Celeron 366s oc'ed to 550) in motherboards without a fan and with the bios overheat protection disabled. They would run for about a minute and crash. After a 5 minute cool down, they would be fine.

I believe that the catastrophic shutdown has been a feature of Intel processors ever since the Pentium MMX, although it has not been documented as such.

Catastrophic shutdown and thermal monitoring appear to be separate systems -- indeed, it seems they use separate on-chip diodes. In order for the shutdown feature to be reliable, it would have to be automatic. High temperatures in the PC case could cause other components to fail before the processor -- e.g., the graphics card. In turn, this could cause a driver level crash or infinite loop with bios interrupts disabled.

Relying on software (bios) for catastrophic protection seems too risky.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext