<<It's a shame that you don't bother with minor issues like facts or credible evidence to form an opinion...... And you certainly won't let facts or credible evidence change your POV either.>>
Ha....thats a pretty good one there Tim......Facts and credible evidence......you mean like these few items that are only the tip of the iceburg that were brought up earlier?? :
<<(1) Rambus v. Infineon judge declares prima facie fraud.
(2) Three federal appeals court judges agree with 1.
(3) Hyundai v. Infineon judge releases secret Rambus documents to press.
(4) Rambus drops ITC suit.
(5) ITC judge rules Rambus is "judge shopping".
(6) Rambus v. Infineon jury convicts Rambus of fraud.
(7) Rambus v. Infineon judge declares SDRAM does not infringe. >>
I could go on and on and talk about all the rulings to date, the probable class action suits sure to be filed, the fact that their largest customer has an out clause if patents are not upheld, and the fact that many of their customers will probably stop sending them any payment whatsoever. I could talk about their mounting legal fee's, and now doubtful earnings due to drop in price, lost court cases, unsure of future royalties and etc.......But no, none of this matters....none of this is CREDIBLE to you...LOL......
I could go on and rebuff the rest of your long pompous post, but I dont need to waste my time for you. As I have stated so many times, there is no winning with you, so why bother trying....you think you are correct 100% of the time and you think you speak for all people, when you speak for very few....... so why bother trying to convince you of anything else??? You go on and do your thing.....I will not address all your ridiculous crappola in your post.....
By the way, you do know what that brown drippy stuff dripping from your ears is, don't you? ....When your as full of $hit as you are, it has to come out someplace.... |
