SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: frankw1900 who wrote (2267)5/16/2001 2:04:51 PM
From: ahhahaRead Replies (1) of 24758
 
You can sight whatever sources you wish, but I heard him at UCB 30 years ago state that taxes should be used to control government debt.

But I don't think he believed in sock it to em taxation or unlimited debt. He was of the opinion that government share of GDP more than about 25% was crippling but did believe governments should vigorously manage that ~25% to fit policy ends.

Just how does government "manage" the debt? Government must incur a debt to manage. Minsky thought government should actively maintain a sizable debt in order to realize presumably other desirable aspects of economy. The idea was that widows and orphans need protected income and what other vehicle could deliver that but treasury debt?

He certainly was not a believer in social programs.

His intent was that the debt would provide a protected class of investable securities presumably immune to the supposed chaos of financial markets. Yet the existence of the debt creates an environment of volatility rather than of buffering against change, because it raises the uncertainty of financing. Government debt doesn't crowd out, but it does create uncertainty. Minsky's debt management is just another veiled social program.

You should realize that like a lot of '60s university socialists who advocated the destruction of free market capitalism because it was an inferior system(it is no system), Minsky changed his spots. What else could they do? Even though during the '70s they fought vehemently to prove the superiority of socialism, every economy in the world was gradually refuting them by real experiments in the field.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext