SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Mining Stocks

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TrueScouse who wrote (994)5/16/2001 2:08:29 PM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (1) of 4051
 
I've seen the number 25% of the difference between POG and cash cost used for advanced prospects and reserves: for example POG 270-150 cash cost= $125 X 25%= $30/oz. Resources would be less.

The days of $100/oz exploration deposits are long over, and the last deals at those levels are referred to as "the winner's curse". The market is really valuing deposits with cash costs over $200 as worthless, and over $175 nearly so. In fact, what intrigues me are that the ones between 150-175 (below which are considered top quartile)are also valued nominally. Once you get down below 100, you start to see some double digit per ounce values. In CBD's case, we need to bet on the numbers being tweaked lower, as right now they are over 175. It's a pretty good bet, given what we are paying today. If you want an example of a value (less than buck an ounce on EV basis)put on an excellent deposit (PNG: difficult country?), with huge upside expansion potential look at MNP.

This little formula is probably too simple, as a bunch of other variables (political risk, capex/quick start, expansion likelihood, synergies, etc.) also need to be evaluated, but is a start and also allows investors to picture leverage to POG.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext