SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 206.93-3.1%3:43 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mani1 who started this subject5/16/2001 6:28:00 PM
From: stribe30Read Replies (1) of 275872
 
Ashok Kumar comments on Intel and to a lesser extent AMD at Zdnet UK

May 16, 2001
Intel: Planning the next move
Helped along by its powerful Athlon processor, Advanced Micro
Devices has slowly made headway against Intel during the past year.

By Ashok Kumar

Although it gained only a couple points of market share, AMD's gains are greater
when measured in dollars because the company charges more for Athlon than for its
older K6 processors. Taking advantage of a weak point, AMD caught its archrival at the
tail end of a product cycle. Intel tried to counter with its aging Pentium III design, but that
chip barely made it to 1GHz even as Athlon soared as high as 1.2GHz.

Intel subsequently brought out the faster Pentium 4 at the end of last year, but that chip
remains expensive and available only in limited quantities. The initial Pentium 4,
code-named Willamette, has a relatively large die size, which increases its cost and
limits production. Furthermore, Pentium 4 is available only with Rambus memory, which
is also expensive and in short supply. In brief, all this has made it difficult for Intel to
position its fast processor against Athlon.

Ramping up P4 and beyond

The problem should be alleviated over the course of this year, but it
will still take another year before the Pentium 4 really hits its stride.
First, Intel is increasing capacity in the 0.18-micron fabrication plants that can build Pentium 4. In fact, the shortfall in PC sales is actually accelerating the transition to Pentium 4. This is because the fewer chips Intel needs to build, the more capacity it has left over for the large Willamette die.

This summer, Intel is expected to introduce a new chipset, code-named Brookdale, which combines Pentium 4 with low-cost SDRAM memory. While SDRAM will reduce the cost of Pentium 4 systems (compared with Rambus memory), it also reduces system performance significantly. Some consumers may not notice or care, but others will avoid the SDRAM boxes.

In the fall, Intel plans to roll out a 0.13-micron version of the Pentium 4 known as Northwood. In this next-generation process, Northwood will be a fraction of the size of Willamette. This change will reduce Intel's cost to build the Pentium 4 and will allow the company to greatly increase production levels. In addition, Northwood will push the
Pentium 4's clock speed to 2GHz and beyond.

Finally, in early 2002, Intel plans to upgrade Brookdale to support DDR SDRAM. This
memory combines high performance with low cost. Northwood systems with DDR
SDRAM will offer price and performance well beyond what AMD will have. This
combination should allow Intel to take back some of the market share it has lost to AMD.

Intel is laying the groundwork to gain market share with a huge investment in
manufacturing facilities. The company plans $7.5 billion in capital expenditures this year
and has not trimmed these plans in the face of falling revenue. This investment is crucial
for the transition to 0.13-micron manufacturing and to 300-millimeter wafers. As noted
above, 0.13 micron offers both lower cost and higher speed, an irresistible
combination.

The larger 300-millimeter wafers cut manufacturing costs by an additional 30 percent or
so. Intel underestimated PC demand for 1999 and early 2000. In 2002, the company
does not want to be in a similar position and leave market share on the table. The huge
cap-ex plan is critical to ensure that capacity is not a limiting factor in 2002 and
beyond. With a six- to 12-month lead over AMD and others in both 0.13-micron and
300-millimeter wafers, Intel will be the lowest-cost producer, enhancing its gross
margins and affording the company an edge in any price war.

Looking ahead to 2002
Intel's 2002 shipments will also be boosted by Microsoft's Xbox, which is expected to
debut late this year. If Xbox is successful, shipments could easily exceed 10 million in
2002. These units will use a low-cost version of Pentium III, reducing the revenue
impact, but Xbox could still add a nice bump to Intel's revenue.

Even without the economic downturn, 2001 was shaping up to be a lackluster year for
Intel. We knew that the large Willamette die would reduce Intel's margins and hinder its ability to increase shipments. The technology transitions from Willamette/Rambus to Willamette/SDRAM to Northwood/SDRAM to
Northwood/DDR will tax the resources of many PC makers, further inhibiting Pentium 4 sales.

But by the start of next year, Intel will be pumping out Northwoods at 2-plus GHz and will have a cost and performance advantage over AMD and plenty of manufacturing capacity. If the general economy turns around by that time, Intel will be ready for a rapid turnaround.

Besides the supply-side fix there are other potential drivers of demand. Among them are the W2K upgrade cycle and the secular trend toward notebooks in the commercial market. In addition, the launch later this year of Windows XP Home Edition, which blends the stability and reliability of W2K with the consumer-oriented features of the Windows 9x line, should resuscitate consumer demand. However, we do not expect the macro environment and the technology cycle to align favorably until 2002.

With Intel's share price down more than 60 percent from its 52-week high, is it too late to sell? If demand does not pick up in the second half of 2001, it is likely that Intel will retest the valuation lows of 1998, taking the stock down to the high teens. When we do come out on the other side of this bear market, investors should be in a position to
"buy" and not "sell on rallies."

To have your say online click on TalkBack and go to the ZDNet forums.

anchordesk.co.uk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext