Dear Uncle Frank, I appreciate your concern about forms
of presentation on this thread, especially the use
of "gritty" metaphors. Since I do not recall any objections
from you with regard to the recent post,
Message 15811481 ,
I am forced to guess that the following excerpt
is a good example to follow:
"your post #42686 leaves me with the sort of feeling I get if someone lets there dog poop on my lawn and isn't courteous enough to clean it up."
Concerning "negative comments about individuals holding differing or even incorrect opinions", I apologize for
disturbing your calm thread, and cordially agree that
individuals may state their opinions as long as they
indentify them as such. However, if an individual
dresses his "incorrect" opinion as a cornerstone
fact, as it was in the post #42668,
"the one DDR savings grace: it is cheap, is no longer the case. RDRAM price premium is comparable to DDR",
I reserve the right to point the mistake out, which
I exercised in a relatively polite form.
Unfortunately, the individual, instead of admitting
the obvious stretch, has decided to back up his
ludicrous claim with several points, each of them
being totally false. I can't believe that a reasonable
and honest individual can stretch the truth to such
extent, especially if he was pointed out to several
logical and factual flaws in his reasoning before,
on the same SI thread.
Message 14675783
Message 14667787
Please bear in mind that the cost is a cornerstone
issue in the whole Rambus memory business, alone with
questionable performance benefits.
With due respect,
- Ali Chen |
