SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ali Chen who wrote (42760)5/17/2001 5:49:53 PM
From: tinkershaw  Read Replies (3) of 54805
 
Today we know
that the Rambus-1 has failed in PC market. Only after
7-year-long efforts from real manufacturers - Intel
and others - the Rambus memory was able to meet the
PC requirements.

That is the equivalent of saying that CDMA in 1996 was not able to meet the needs in the handset market. Which is ridiculous. Of course, in 1996, CDMA could have met the needs of the marketplace. It simply wasn't necessary at the time given the state of wireless technology at the time. Similarly RDRAM, even in its initial 500 Mhz format was not really necessary prior to reaching these Ghz speeds which are not becoming mainstream.

Heck, I'm typing on a Pentium II, 266 Mhz computer. RDRAM and high-bandwidth, and Ghz processors are still not necessary. Doesn't mean it won't be in everyone's box within a year.

In regard to the other theory: To fit it
into mass-manufactured PCs, the memory must meet
certain requirements: the channel must
be long enough to accommodate manufacturable packaging,
modules must be socketed, etc

Then how do you explain DDR which has so far proven as unstable as the initial 820 mislaunches and also due to inherent stability problems (which I'm sure will eventually be worked out, but not at the moment for mass market and certainly not for the corporate market this year anyways. Much less trying to get the DDR 266 working). Micron has certainly not seemed to have any problem trying to establish a non-standardized technology, for which compatible parts vary from manufacturer to manufacturer as the standard, and stuffing them in a box. In fact Micron had a monopoly on the DDR PC market for the past year, they ended up practically paying someone to take over their PC business and their DDR monopoly.

Tinker
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News