The Justa and Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Justa and Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club Thread

VTI 337.09

+0.2%

Dec 4 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: MrGreenJeans who wrote (1153)	5/18/2001 9:22:41 AM
From: Boca_PETE	Read Replies (1) of 10065

RE: BUSH PROPOSED ENERGY POLICY Any comments on it ? cnn.com It seemed well thought out and practical to me. Of course the usual suspects were there to bash it before the ink was dry, and the media played way more of these comments than any objective reactions. As for California's immediate squeeze, what comes to mind as a possible solution in addition to loosening regulatory hurdles are Federal loan guarantees in exchange for evidence that contracts have been entered into to construct power generation facilities, fuel cell manufacturing plants and research facilities, hydroelectric generation projects, geothermal and other alternative energy development projects... have been entered into. After all, the FED's bailed out New York, Mexaco, .... IMHO, we are fortunate to have elected leaders with such vast experience and knowledge in the energy industry. Too bad most don't realize this and see it immediately as a liability and assume the worst. After-all, if the energy industry is blocked from earning profits, where will the incentive come from to invest in needed energy generation facilities ? P

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next