Steve's Channelling Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mark Johnson who wrote (16039)	5/18/2001 9:57:17 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) of 30051

<<Heck, Zeev was predicting $55 a share for Valence last year....go figure....?.>> And there is the difference. Zeev changed his mind about VLNC when the technicals deteriorated and was out of the stock BEFORE the 90% decline. In contrast, Wolanchuk has been calling VLNC the "next $100 stock" for at least 4 years (during which they have failed to earn a penny of profits), and was touting it to go to $50, just before the bubble burst. Zeev's ability to change his mind (which you ridicule constantly) steered him away from a 90% decline, while anybody who bought Wolanchuk's Feb. 2000 touts (including VLNC, WAVC, and ANTS "the next $1,000 stock") lost 90% of their money. And I'd guess your unhealthy fixation on Zeev is precisely BECAUSE he changed his mind and realized big profits on VLNC while you held and watched your profits melt away. Get help.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next