SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Glenayre Technologies(GEMS)- a pure cellular PCS play?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JHP who wrote (3406)5/18/2001 12:46:50 PM
From: KyrosL  Read Replies (1) of 3431
 
I read the patent and I agree. The patent was filed in 1998. Most of their claims were state of the art way before that. They can't claim that fundamental computer addressing principles belong to them just because one of the devices addressed is a pager. It's like the inventor of the bicycle claiming ownership of the wheel, just because the bicycle has wheels and the inventor of the wheel did not file for a patent when the wheel was invented back in the stone age!

The patent office nowadays depends on the companies filling for patents to do correctly the search for prior art. The courts resolve problems, if that search was not right, as is obvious in the RIM patent. Ever since the patent rules were relaxed to include software patents, the quality of patents filled in the US has deteriorated dramatically.

Kyros
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext