SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Amateur Traders Corner

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeev Hed who wrote (9589)5/19/2001 9:35:29 AM
From: Tom Hua  Read Replies (3) of 19633
 
Good morning Zeev, as you know not every small 1-product software company should be valued on the same metrics that are used for MSFT, I see no relevance in comparing CCMP to AMAT. There're plenty of small semi/semi equip companies that trade with PE of 10 or lower, at P/S of about 1 or lower. If you use those metrics, CCMP should be valued at about $20.

Keep in mind that CCMP's forward growth is declining significantly which will become obvious to you. In addition, there's new competition coming to the market, competition from well established, well funded companies.

And if the court's ruling (could come this Fall) is in favor of Rodel in the patent infringement case filed by Rodel against CCMP, CCMP's revenue will practically go to zero overnight. [ United States Patent No. 5,391,258 (entitled "Compositions and Methods for Polishing") and United States Patent No. 5,476,606 (entitled "Compositions and Methods for Polishing").]

Does RMBS ring a bell?

Regards,

Tom
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext