DAYTRADING Fundamentals Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : DAYTRADING Fundamentals

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mama Bear who wrote (13029)	5/21/2001 4:10:46 PM
From: LPS5	Read Replies (1) of 18137

I've addressed all your questions already, unless you've opted not to read them - which wouldn't be a first. Message 15799944 If the above message didn't straighten you out, well, what can I say? You're as wrong as you've ever been. Reread: Message 15804596 W/regard to the brokerage firm in question, you used the word "l[ie];" not me. I don't think anyone "l[ied]," nor did I say that. Your suggestion as to what Arthur Levitt meant by "the Commission" was characteristically ridiculous - and shown to be so by the link I posted, in the above post pertaining to such. And, only you would argue that it makes far more sense that the daytrading issue would be treated differently - with direct SEC intervention and an indiscriminate blanket labeling of accounts than any other regulatory issues of the past have been treated. Now, reread those messages. Often, and slowly. Your raison d'etre, it would strongly seem - here and elsewhere - is to create a disturbance and be an annoyance, as a quick look at your posting history - even shortly after you left this thread 5 days ago, only to resurface yesterday - shows. By all means - begone. LPS5

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next