SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 101.61+2.8%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (73297)5/21/2001 8:41:08 PM
From: Dave B  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Carl

This is my favorite Dave B post: #reply-15390582 , because in this single post he admits the following:

LOL! You, again, have no clue.

First, please post my "bullish" comments from the INAP thread. The original message you referenced had a quote from an anaylst that said that INAP could get 7% of a $40+B market. I added the comment "Wow". So it doesn't matter if I have an "inside" connection or not. Adding "Wow" to an analyst comment that INAP could grow to a $3B business is pretty tame, by anyone's pumping and dumping standards. The rest of your comments are just inanities.

The funny thing about all this is that Dave B has such an absence of moral maturity

You wouldn't know moral maturity if it bit you in the behind. I'm not the one who has had his posts stricken from the SI threads. I'm not the one who was suspended from SI for making up an article and attributing it to a real organization. If you're interested, you might want to check the mirror for the definition of moral (and general) immaturity.

I guess that explains his failure to realize that what Rambus did with respect to SDRAM was FRAUDULENT.

You've actually never asked me what I thought of the issue. I haven't seen the exact text from the note that the lawyers turned over, but if the reporting on the note is accurate, then, yes, it appears that RMBS tried to fraudulently add claims to their patents. Any other questions?

We had a wonderful time in SF, but it's nice to be back.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News