I suggest that for you to conclude that I ascribe good based on reference is in the context of the posts clueless logic or a form of lying bait spin suggesting something said or implied that was not.
Clueless? Lying bait spin? (as opposed to "truthful bait spin", I guess). You said "Yes mad, they are two good men. Now I cannot put mr bill or al gore and based on comments and conduct of liberaman gephart and dashal, I cannot put their names in such a post." Seems to me you were ascribing good by using a comparison to evil. To me, demonstrating they are better than evil doesn't mean they are good. It just means they are not evil. Oh, but I forgot, I am stupid and lazy. <g>
As to President Bush reneging on some promise, that is such silly and bogus retard's spin bait crap.
Didn't President Bush say during the campaign certain things about the environment and some specific environmental standards and then back down from those positions pretty early in his Presidency (particularly with respect to CO2 I think it was)? You can puff out your cheeks and call me silly, bogus, retard, and full of "spin bait crap" (BTW, is "spin bait crap" animal, vegetable or mineral?). Those are names which I have not called you.
I would be interested in knowing whether (1) President Bush made such a promise; and (2) whether he kept it.
I don't care, in the context of your answer, whether Clinton or Gore ever lied. I just want to know about Bush.
Thanks,
OMD |
