SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (2705)5/26/2001 4:22:16 AM
From: Francois Goelo  Read Replies (4) of 5315
 
Jorj, I find your Veiled Allegations Highly Amusing...

1) If I was a Promoter paid to Push SEVU without a Disclosure, in violation of SEC Rule 17(b), would I be using my real name, instead of a convenient Alias?...

2) I believe SEC has been investigating SEVU since early January and that the accounts of most people posting regularly on the Stock have received extensive review from SEC... If I had done anything illegal, would I still be posting?...

As a corollary, if SEVU was the Scam claimed by A@P, would it still be trading at the time the investigation must be winding down?

3) Your Conspiracy stories of paid stock Touts and Promoters of OTCBB stocks on the Boards are highly biased and mostly unfounded... Once you understand that only 5 to 10% of OTCBB's are worth considering and that the rest is Garbage, you still have between 300 and 600 Companies to look at...

Evidently, the failure rate, given the poor odds is quite high, BUT so is the Reward Ratio and I have picked a number of stocks that have run between 3000 and 7000%, last year... Today, they're not lower, in percentage, than the NASDAQ high flyers and Wall Street Darlings, such as AKAM or CMGI...

4) You also well know that I say Positive and Negative things about Companies in which I own stock, including SEVU... What about NBMX, for instance, where I owned 500,000 (fully paid) shares when I was posting the following?...

ragingbull.lycos.com

ragingbull.lycos.com

ragingbull.lycos.com

Next time, try to make an argument you can Win...

JMHO, F. Goelo + + +

PS: I know you're going to say next that you didn't imply anything pejorative, which is the usal flip you guys do when shown to be wrong... Or, you'll say: "how come you were invested in the same stock Anthony was pushing... very suspicious"... Well, that's how I came across Anthony...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext