E, your deeply emotional reaction to this liberal economists article, e.g. posting it on numerous threads in order to get attention. Seems (on the surface), to be a crying out of concern for budgetary numbers not measuring up. Is that because you *care* about the budget not measuring up? Or, is it because you care about *Bush* not measuring up and being able to throw some stones his way?
I believe the latter, which is why you refuse to answer any follow-up questions related to budgetary concerns i.e. The Balanced budget amendment.
Since you've all but clarified your motivation in posting the article multiple times, (makes a fair Democrat talking point spin), I felt it only right to do the same in reverse. Political talking points beget political talking points.
If on the other hand, you've posted the article and engaged in these posts because of a deep desire and concern about our budgetary numbers not working out, then you would be very willing to discuss other matters which directly bare on fiscal policy issues. The fact that you will not discuss the issue, answer one question, or engage at all in other fiscal policy concerns, exposes your motivation for all to see.
Now, tell us E, you were sent that article via some Democrat email motivation system, in order to see if they could get some talking point legs out of it weren't you?
LOL, Good luck! |
