SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: im a survivor who wrote (35480)5/29/2001 9:17:45 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) of 35685
 
Which story are you sticking to Keith? This one where you seem to imply your concurrence that you may have an actionable grievance against me?

Monday, May 28, 2001 5:04 PM ""Hmmm, Interesting....I received another e-mail advising me that I should "archive" wstera's last posts to me, as in their opinion, they felt the post was improper and possibly libelous......... If it's a headache he wants........he may be barking up the right tree.""

Message 15862465
____________________________________________________________

Or today's version where you now state I am the one who try to pull 'any legal crap'???

May 29, 2001 8:31 AM <I said><<Libelous?>>KG4 replied "" Couldn't tell you....all I know is I received an e-mail from someone that thought it was and recommended I start archiving your posts in case you try and pull any legal crap with me.""

Message 15864134
____________________________________________________________

You seem to be fixated on addressing what you perceive to be slanderous & libelous issues Keith..........

<To:Estephen - From: KG4> ""I hereby request you remove my name from your above mentioned list......... You putting my name on your list, in my opinion, is slander and libelous.""

Message 15859463
____________________________________________________________

FWIW, I agree with the response you received to your post to Estephen.........

Message 15868091
____________________________________________________________

That is why I replied "ludicrous" to your apparent interest in an actionable libel case against me.

Your perception of reality changes frequently Keith. At times, your version of reality seems to change to suit the POV you are trying to pass of now........ irregardless of what you, or others, have said in the past. Unfortunately, you cannot change what has been written in the past Keith. Why can't you accept this reality?

And that is why we have problems Keith. IMO, you are severely perception challenged. I have used your own words repeatedly to show that you have a serious problem between your ever changing perception of reality & cold hard facts.

I tend to deal with known facts when I make absolute assertions. You do not.

You may believe with every fiber of your being that you are right. Unfortunately I have shown repeatedly that what you believe to be true & the cold hard facts are often mutually exclusive versions of history.

If you want me to stop replying to your posts, quit lying, or posting your perception of reality as though it is fact. Also stop with the vulgar insults & personal attacks about my peers & myself. Discuss the issues rather than attack those who have a different opinion than yours. Stick to the facts when talking in absolute terms. Just stick to the fact no matter what Keith. You will find that I will not have problems with you if you can manage to achieve this.

If not, expect me to continue to set the facts straight.

Ö¿Ö
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext