So you believe that anyone that comes here to discuss any topic must automatically assume they are wrong and you are right, or they are not genuine? Do you realize how stupid that makes you look? You believe the opposite of my position to be true, does that disqualify you or somehow de-legitimize your motives? Why should you receive the benefit of the doubt when you deny it to others?
The above paragraph points out how addled you are. Every sentence was made up by you, not by me. And every sentence is false. It is almost impossible to discuss anything with you because you don't seem to be able to grasp what is being said. You mix up ideas like you're mixing up brain salad.
This is what I said: "You believe that the bible is Truth and absolutely inerrant. You have said so. So your discussion with me has never been genuine."
This has absolutely nothing to do with the trash that you just made up. Let me help you with it.
Having a position is not the same thing as having a FIXED position. My "Should God Be Replaced" is an invitation for people to honestly explore religions, scriptures, science, etc. and to struggle with the ideas and concepts. You, however, considered your delusions of truth, to, in fact, be Absolute TRUTH. To comprehend any part of Absolute TRUTH would require an Absolute COMPREHENSION. In other words, you believed you were God! From the beginning I found that to be so amusing!
The reason your discussion with me was not genuine was simply this: You were not honestly sharing in a search for truth. You believed you WERE the truth. Your goal, therefore, was one of obfuscation and rationalization.
Nothing anyone said, or could have said, had any chance of engaging you in a reasoning process--because reasoning was not your goal. Your goal was to defend your delusions by denying all the evidence that was presented to you showing that the Tribal God of the bible was evil and psychotic. An actual God would presumably be none of those things, but you were not there to share in the reasoning process. You were there to tell us that you had read in some old tribal documents that Yahweh was God, and that you knew it was true because one line in the documents said it was true. This was the extent of your committment to "reasoning".
BTW I have posed the same question to you and all I get is out of context scripture passages (talking of pedophiles)
Sorry, but you did not.
As for the rest of your post, it speaks for itself: spit and bile from an angry and frustrated man. Other than the fact that you are capable of braying like a donkey--what else were you trying to communicate about your character?
And as for your complaint that "vituperative" is too big a word for you--well, the word ain't going to get any shorter while you stand there gawking. Grab a dictionary and deal with it. |
