SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 94.58-0.9%2:32 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ian@SI who started this subject5/31/2001 3:16:15 AM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (2) of 93625
 
Hi all; Ptnewell said that PC2100 wouldn't work:

ptnewell, Yahoo RMBS thread, August 23, 2000
... DDR-200 may or may not be practical in a PC. The DDR noise problem is not a fiction of Intel, it is fundamental physics. Specifically, Faraday's Law, one of Maxwell's equations, tells us that the inductive currents (noise) generated is proportional to the voltage swing. RDRAM uses voltage steps of 0.4 volts at a time; DDR uses 2.5 volts/step. This is why RDRAM can run faster and yet be cleaner. DDR-266 is quite improbable in a PC setting. Unfortunately for DDR, basic physics cannot be finessed.
...
Since DDR has 1/4 the bandwidth, lacks granularity/scalability, has the same production costs, has much higher design costs, the outcome is quite clear.

messages.yahoo.com

This post is from long enough ago that the full depth of ptnewell's delusions is clear. His more recent postings will look as silly, 6 to 18 months from now, but the above is already a classic.

-- Carl
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext