SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 96.35+5.4%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dave B who wrote (73958)5/31/2001 11:29:04 AM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Dave thanks for the explanation. As you say, given all the delays that hit Merced, they should have had plenty of time to move on to RDRAM. I never had to do a memory design so perhaps my question is trivial. Are you saying that now Intel cannot have RDRAM go with Itanium? Is the change not as simple as replacing the 460GX chip set with something that supports RDRAM? How is McKinley different in its support for RDRAM and does it support DDR as well?

Sorry to ask so many questions, its just that I've been thinking that RDRAM should have a better chance in the server market than in desktop.

thanks,
ST
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext