SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 96.40+5.4%Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dave B who wrote (73958)5/31/2001 12:20:52 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (2) of 93625
 
"..the Itanium was initiated long before Intel selected RDRAM"

What a convenient explanation for you!
(Given that Intel has had first grip on the
whole Rambus design and implementation since 1991)

"By the time RDRAM showed up, the Itanium (Merced) was behind schedule"...
which would give more time for chipset designers
to built a Rambus controller, wouldn't it? Unless there
are some serious considerations against Rambus in
server products...

I think the consideration is/was very simple: Rambus
today cannot hold more than 1GB of RAM per channel,
since only 2 RIMMs can work more or less reliably
on a channel. Even with 8 channels it will give you
only 8GB of RAM, which is NONE for todays server
or workstation standards, while the apparent strategic
cometitive target was to support up to 64GB.
More, it is impossible to fit 8 Rambus channels
around one memory controller unless the board is
12 layers (current i850GX P-4 boards are 6-layer,
and the Rambus tracing occupies about 1/3 of the
chip perimeter).

Even if you double the DRAM chip density (Carl: when it
will happen?), the Rambus approach would be still
4-8x short of strategic targets for RAM capacity.

- Ali
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext