The idea of you "fully dissecting" anyone's "faulty thinking" is so hilarious.
You left this part off. (Yeah, I know, the link was there.)
This is what you quoted -- my lesson to you in how to acknowledge an error, albeit humorously, as miniscule an error though it was:
I apologize for doing that, and assure you that if I'd understood that two was numerous, I wouldn't have gotten confused and put that word "multiple" inaccurately in the same quotes with "numerous," which means, I now understand, "two."
This puts the above in perspective, I'd say, following immediately as it does the above:
I'm a bit puzzled about why, if two (2) threads is, to you, "numerous" threads, you didn't just say so... etc.
That was followed by my description of what you pretend to think was a genuine threat!:
...(the post with "hehe" and "*scary music*" and the words "haunt" and "Pleeeeeeeze" and "teeeeeny weeeny" and "Hint! It's a single digit!" in it!)...
Threat, Michael? Have you no pride?
Now for your insinuation that I have a history of making threats. I'll prove it now. You will evade, as is your inane wont. |
