SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: greenspirit who wrote (150356)6/3/2001 10:29:51 AM
From: E  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
<<Oh my, you're now having a tizzy because of one letter <s> added to a word??>>

Oh my, now asking for proof that i issued threats is 'having a tizzy'?

Michael, you know what? Plural is a concept, not a letter.

Like, "more than one threat," for example, contains the concept, but not the letter.

Concept. Implying more than one.

<<If you interpreted the S to mean I implied multiple threats in the past, than I am truly sorry E. >>

Now we're getting somewhere! You say you never intended those words "E, you should realize by now your threats are completely meaningless to me" to imply I had issued threats!

Excellent progress, Michael.

Now to talk about whether I threatened ProLife. You, not I, raised the issue, so you must have meant to imply it. Of course, perhaps you didn't!

ProLife posted a lie. I called him on it. He continued to post it. Then he had the audacity to post a science URL that further refuted his lie-- but, since he didn't understand this, he wrote, "Any questions, Class?," implying that the URL substantiated the lie.

He also wrote to me:

"You have shown nothing to be a lie. But I do understand that one in your position will require you to continue your tapping."

But I had, in fact, shown it to be a lie. So I wrote, in response to "Any questions, Class?", "YES! YES! I have a question, Professor!"

And in response to:

"You have shown nothing to be a lie. But I do understand that one in your position will require you to continue your tapping,"

I wrote, "Oh, I will "keep tapping"! -- Until you produce the evidence... or admit it was a lie you posted and a lie your movement has been promulgating for years. I want to see the evidence, or I want you to try to stop it... "

So your position would appear to be that to assure someone who is repeatedly promulgating a big lie and continues to defend the lie, that you will continue to "tap," -- using his own word for refute the lie-- is a "threat."

I can see why you might feel threatened by the truth. Still, that's a different and special meaning of the word "threat," i believe.

You guys just hate it when you're caught out in lies. Wiggle wiggle squirm squirm.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext