The way in which you called it a draw was to say that Yes, it was a meaningless quotation error; but that you found his pretence that it wasn't, amusing.
That isn't a draw, Neocon.
So you won't provide even ONE example in which I did the same thing -- which was your implied rationale for its being okay and amusing for Michael to do it?
Not even one, for heaven's sake?
Calling all threadsters: I am requesting all reading this to find a single example, ONE, in which what Neocon has implied is the case: that i have made much of meaningless, harmless, quite neutral quotation errors.
There are many people reading this. I have posted lengthily in this discussion. All the posts are here. I assert that I did no such thing, that it is a pretence that I did, a pretence required to justify defending such disreputable argumentation.
Can anyone on this thread, since Neocon can't, produce a single example in which i have objected to a harmless, meaningless, ethically-neutral misquote?
ONE.
Thank you. |
